|
GOLF TEACHING PRO®
EVOLUTION
of
the Golf Swing
By
Mark Harman
USGTF Course Director, Pensacola, FL
Many
of us know that Byron Nelson is considered the father of the modern
swing. Yet, Nelson’s swing is but one of many stages of evolution
the golf swing has undergone throughout history. In fact, the concept
of the ideal swing has changed somewhat since Nelson’s prime. We’ll
get to that later in this article.
For
a few hundred years, the “St. Andrews swing” was considered the
gold standard in British golf, dictated by the ball. The “feathery”
consisted of wet down or feathers stuffed into a wet leather pouch,
which was then sewn together. When the feathers dried, they expanded,
and when the leather dried, it contracted, making for a hard, playable
golf ball.
Since
the science of aerodynamics was slightly less advanced back then,
no one really put much thought into that aspect of the ball. Because
the feathery had no dimples, and thus very little in the way of
lift and carry, it was pointless to try to hit the ball high into
the air. Greater distance and control could be achieved by hitting
it low, which necessitated a flatter, more roundhouse swing action
– the “St. Andrews swing.” In concert with this motion swing, the
stance was closed and the ball was played farther back in the stance
than you see today, both of which promoted an inside-out swing path.
This set-up and swing produced a low draw, which gave maximum distance
and accuracy for this ball.
In
1848, the gutta-percha ball came into being. Made out of sap from
trees found in Southeast Asia, the “gutty” soon
replaced the feathery as the ball of choice. The gutty was much
cheaper to produce than a feathery, lasted longer, and flew farther
after it got nicked up a little bit. Players and ball makers soon
noticed the latter factor, and began to carve patterns into the
ball. Later, molds evolved to do the same job.
Even
though the gutty could be flown higher than the feathery, the swing
did not evolve to take advantage of this fact, until the great champion
Harry Vardon happened on the scene. Vardon employed an upright swing,
which apparently was in common use in the area where Vardon grew
up. He writes, “There is some mystery as to why we Jersey players
hit up on this method in preference to the other. Possibly it was
that we just naturally took the club up to the top by the shortest
route.”
For
whatever reason he developed his swing, it allowed Vardon to better
take advantage of the improved aerodynamic properties of the gutta-percha
ball. He was known to hit the ball higher, straighter, and farther
than his contemporaries. Vardon also influenced the way the majority
of professionals hold the golf club, by employing the overlapping
grip.
Vardon
claims he invented the grip, while others say he merely popularized
it, but no one can dispute he is responsible for the widespread
use that came about from his using it.
In
the 1920’s, another great champion emerged. Bobby Jones, using Vardon’s
upright style that had become the standard, took golf to new levels.
With his boyish good looks and charisma, Jones also employed a great
turning action of his body. Since the hickory-shafted golf clubs
of the day had lots of torque, timing the swing to get the clubface
back to square
was somewhat problematic. This was easier to do with a fuller body
rotation and active hands throughout the hitting area.
Although
steel shafts were patented in 1910, they didn't become legal for
play until 1924, when the USGA approved them for tournament play.
The R&A followed suit in 1929. About this time, Byron Nelson was
developing what became known as the "modern swing" as a young caddie
in Fort Worth, Texas. His swing was more conducive to the lower
torque found in steel shafts. Nelson introduced elements that we
see in today's swing: less body turning on the backswing and greater
coil, strongly initiating the downswing with the lower body, and
less hand action through impact.
A contemporary of Nelson's, Ben Hogan, wrote a series of articles
for Sports Illustrated in 1957 that were made into the historic
book, "Five Lessons: The Modern Fundamentals of Golf." Hogan's main
contributions were the idea of a weaker grip and the concept of
the swing plane. Hogan advocated that the grips' V's point no farther
right than the right eye. Also, his idea of the swing plane promoted
a somewhat flatter swing than did Nelson's.
When
Jack Nicklaus rose to prominence, the concept of the ideal swing
changed again. Nicklaus had a stronger grip than Hogan did, and
he also swung on a higher plane - a swing more reminiscent of Nelson's.
Nicklaus, though, through the teaching of his long-time coach, Jack
Grout, emphasized a wide swing arc for power by extending the left
arm and cocking the wrists on the backswing as late as feasible.
Nicklaus also employed a strong lateral leg drive and a slight reverse-C
finish, which were taken to a new level by Johnny Miller in the
mid-1970's.
Throughout the 1970's and early 1980's, a swing with a strong lateral
leg drive and reverse-C finish was considered the standard. In 1985,
then-little-known teaching professional David Leadbetter started
working with Nick Faldo. Prior to this, Faldo utilized a strong
lateral leg drive and reverse-C finish, but he was unsatisfied by
the inconsistency he felt this swing gave him. Leadbetter didn't
believe this swing was the best, and he advocated a more rotary
motion, with the legs used mainly for support, not power. He also
didn't believe it was necessary to stretch out the left arm as far
as possible on the backswing, instead preferring an earlier cocking
of the wrists to promote the rotary action he
preferred. Leadbetter also wanted Faldo to get rid of his reverse-C
follow-through by instead finishing in a more straight-up manner.
It took two years of hard work, but afterwards Faldo went on to
win six major titles and numerous other golf tournaments.
Just when many teachers and players were figuring that the permanent
ideal was the Leadbetter-Faldo swing, along came Tiger Woods. Where
Nicklaus' swing emphasized power and Faldo's swing emphasized control,
Woods sought to incorporate both elements into his swing. Working
with teaching professional Butch Harmon, Woods combined the wide
arc of Nicklaus' swing for power with the rotary action of Faldo's
swing for control. The results? As of this writing, Woods has 39
PGA Tour wins and eight majors.
So,
does this mean that Woods' swing will remain the gold standard?
For the foreseeable future, probably, but don't bet on it in the
long run. For, as we have seen, the ideal swing of the day has undergone
many changes, even as its practitioners thought things could not
get any better. Still today, advocates of such methods as Natural
Golf and other alternative methods are touting their swings as superior
to the one employed by Woods.
Will there be a day when most everyone on tour employs one of these
methods? Time will tell. But, one thing we can say for certain:
it's likely that the concept of the ideal swing will continue to
change as long as golf is played.
Back
to Main Articles
Copyright © 2011 United States Golf Teachers Federation, All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this article in any kind is strictly prohibited.
|